Buck DC to DC Converter - Ideal State Average Mike DonnellyDesigner19 × Mike Donnelly Member for 10 years 4 months 1,529 designs 10 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design.</p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. </p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisDesign Trade-offs Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby Mike Donnelly × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/47321"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/47321"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/47321 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator PramitDesigner27101 × Pramit Member for 8 years 1 month 2 designs 1 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby Pramit × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/46406"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/46406"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/46406 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator AndrewTrumanDesigner1171 × AndrewTruman Member for 8 years 6 months 2 designs 1 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby AndrewTruman × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/24551"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/24551"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/24551 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator Adam CablerDesigner30 × Adam Cabler Member for 10 years 2 months 188 designs 1 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby Adam Cabler × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/1331"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/1331"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/1331 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator SethKirkDesigner279 × SethKirk Member for 8 years 10 months 3 designs 1 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby SethKirk × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/771"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/771"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/771 Newer Name for Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator DGBDesigner12 × DGB Member for 10 years 4 months 116 designs 10 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby DGB × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/719"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/719"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/719 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator Mike DonnellyDesigner19 × Mike Donnelly Member for 10 years 4 months 1,529 designs 10 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby Mike Donnelly × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/451"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/451"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/451
Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator PramitDesigner27101 × Pramit Member for 8 years 1 month 2 designs 1 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby Pramit × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/46406"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/46406"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/46406 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator AndrewTrumanDesigner1171 × AndrewTruman Member for 8 years 6 months 2 designs 1 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby AndrewTruman × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/24551"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/24551"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/24551 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator Adam CablerDesigner30 × Adam Cabler Member for 10 years 2 months 188 designs 1 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby Adam Cabler × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/1331"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/1331"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/1331 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator SethKirkDesigner279 × SethKirk Member for 8 years 10 months 3 designs 1 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby SethKirk × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/771"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/771"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/771 Newer Name for Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator DGBDesigner12 × DGB Member for 10 years 4 months 116 designs 10 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby DGB × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/719"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/719"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/719 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator Mike DonnellyDesigner19 × Mike Donnelly Member for 10 years 4 months 1,529 designs 10 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby Mike Donnelly × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/451"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/451"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/451
Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator AndrewTrumanDesigner1171 × AndrewTruman Member for 8 years 6 months 2 designs 1 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby AndrewTruman × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/24551"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/24551"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/24551 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator Adam CablerDesigner30 × Adam Cabler Member for 10 years 2 months 188 designs 1 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby Adam Cabler × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/1331"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/1331"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/1331 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator SethKirkDesigner279 × SethKirk Member for 8 years 10 months 3 designs 1 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby SethKirk × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/771"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/771"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/771 Newer Name for Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator DGBDesigner12 × DGB Member for 10 years 4 months 116 designs 10 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby DGB × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/719"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/719"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/719 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator Mike DonnellyDesigner19 × Mike Donnelly Member for 10 years 4 months 1,529 designs 10 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby Mike Donnelly × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/451"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/451"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/451
Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator Adam CablerDesigner30 × Adam Cabler Member for 10 years 2 months 188 designs 1 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby Adam Cabler × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/1331"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/1331"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/1331 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator SethKirkDesigner279 × SethKirk Member for 8 years 10 months 3 designs 1 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby SethKirk × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/771"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/771"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/771 Newer Name for Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator DGBDesigner12 × DGB Member for 10 years 4 months 116 designs 10 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby DGB × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/719"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/719"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/719 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator Mike DonnellyDesigner19 × Mike Donnelly Member for 10 years 4 months 1,529 designs 10 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby Mike Donnelly × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/451"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/451"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/451
Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator SethKirkDesigner279 × SethKirk Member for 8 years 10 months 3 designs 1 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby SethKirk × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/771"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/771"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/771 Newer Name for Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator DGBDesigner12 × DGB Member for 10 years 4 months 116 designs 10 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby DGB × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/719"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/719"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/719 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator Mike DonnellyDesigner19 × Mike Donnelly Member for 10 years 4 months 1,529 designs 10 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby Mike Donnelly × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/451"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/451"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/451
Newer Name for Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator DGBDesigner12 × DGB Member for 10 years 4 months 116 designs 10 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby DGB × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/719"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/719"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/719 Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator Mike DonnellyDesigner19 × Mike Donnelly Member for 10 years 4 months 1,529 designs 10 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby Mike Donnelly × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/451"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/451"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/451
Buck DC to DC Converter vs. Linear Regulator Mike DonnellyDesigner19 × Mike Donnelly Member for 10 years 4 months 1,529 designs 10 groups Title Description <p>This design shows how an abstract model of a DC to DC converter can be used to make higher level design trade-offs, before committing to or investing engineering effort in detailed circuit design. In this case, a comparison is made between a buck converter and a linear voltage regulator. A model was calibrated to represent an MC7805B, a 5V and 1A Linear Regulator, using only information supplied in the datasheet. </p><p>The model of the buck converter uses a “state-average” abstraction (i.e. the actual switching effect is removed by averaging), so that it simulates very quickly. It can be used for iterative compensator tuning, and also supports small-signal AC analysis. The efficiency and performance of both voltage conversion methods can be analyzed and compared. Performance metrics include line and load transient response, as well as both time-domain and frequency-domain ripple rejection simulations. The results provide the information needed to make key design trade-offs.</p> About text formats Tags Buck ConverterLinear RegulatorState-AverageCompensator TuningLine and load transientsAC AnalysisRipple rejectionDesign Trade-offsMC7805B Select a tag from the list or create your own.Drag to re-order taxonomy terms. License - None - What's this? Design Titleby Mike Donnelly × Embed Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/embed-design/451"></iframe> Embed Live Design Copy Embed Code <iframe allowfullscreen="true" referrerpolicy="origin-when-cross-origin" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="720" scrolling="no" src="https://explore.partquest.com/node/451"></iframe> Share a Link Copy URL https://explore.partquest.com/node/451