inductance collapse | PartQuest™ Explore

Application Area

Mike Donnelly
Designer19

Mike Donnelly

Member for

10 years 5 months

1,547

designs

10

groups

Member of the PartQuest Explore Development Team. Focused on modeling and simulation of analog, mixed-signal and multi-discipline systems covering a broad range of applications, including power electronics, controls and mechatronic systems.

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic.

Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Copy of Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching - on Wed, 04/24/2024 - 12:25

Designer0

Member for

4 years 3 months

0

designs

0

groups

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic.

Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Copy of Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching - on Sun, 04/21/2024 - 12:20

Designer0

Member for

4 years 3 months

0

designs

0

groups

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic.

Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Copy of Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching - on Sun, 04/21/2024 - 12:17

Designer0

Member for

4 years 3 months

0

designs

0

groups

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic.

Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Copy of Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching - on Tue, 03/19/2024 - 17:11

Designer0

Member for

4 years 3 months

0

designs

0

groups

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic.

Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Copy of Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching - on Tue, 03/19/2024 - 17:11

Designer0

Member for

4 years 3 months

0

designs

0

groups

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic.

Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Copy of Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching - on Tue, 03/19/2024 - 17:11

Designer0

Member for

4 years 3 months

0

designs

0

groups

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic.

Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Copy of Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching - on Fri, 01/19/2024 - 20:14

User-1705714372
Designer253319

User-1705714372

Member for

3 months

1

designs

1

groups

Welcome to the community!!

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic.

Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Copy of Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching - on Mon, 01/27/2020 - 10:09

tichboby
Designer229238

tichboby

Member for

4 years 2 months

1

designs

1

groups

Add a bio to your profile to share information about yourself with other SystemVision users.

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic.Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Compare Soft Saturation vs. Regular Inductor - Switching

Ellis
Designer217944

Ellis

Member for

4 years 10 months

3

designs

1

groups

Add a bio to your profile to share information about yourself with other SystemVision users.

Description

This design shows the importance of choosing the right inductor size and type, to avoid saturation-induced current spikes during operating transients. In this case, the start-up transient in two nearly identical open-loop buck power stages (12V -&gt; 3V) is examined. The only difference is that the top circuit is using an inductor calibrated to a Coilcraft XAL6060-223 (22uH), which has "soft saturation" behavior. The bottom circuit is using a similarly sized inductor, but with a more typical "hard saturation" characteristic. Both inductors work well for the steady-state load condition of 3 Amp. But during the turn-on transient, that current can go significantly above that nominal level. At that time, the instantaneous inductance of the hard-saturating device collapses, resulting in even larger current spikes in each switching interval. Note in the waveforms on the left: The soft-saturation inductance drops to 14uH minimum during the transient, whereas the hard-saturation inductance crashes to near 2uH, or only 10% of its nominal value!

About text formats

Terms of Use Cookie Notice Data Privacy Notice

Mike DonnellyDesigner19

Member for

Designer0

Member for

Designer0

Member for

Designer0

Member for

Designer0

Member for

Designer0

Member for

Designer0

Member for

User-1705714372Designer253319

Member for

tichbobyDesigner229238

Member for

EllisDesigner217944

Member for

Mike Donnelly
Designer19

User-1705714372
Designer253319

tichboby
Designer229238

Ellis
Designer217944